Lando Norris, McLaren, Circuit of the Americas, 2018

McLaren accept Norris may make “rookie mistakes” in debut F1 season

RaceFans Round-up

Posted on

| Written by

In the round-up: McLaren Racing CEO Zak Brown says the team will be patient with Lando Norris is he makes “rookie mistakes” during his debut Formula 1 season.

What they say

Brown said McLaren is going through a period of transition which could make Norris’s debut this year more challenging:

We are going to give Lando time. In our expectations, I think it’s a high-pressure environment and the first thing that everyone does in Formula 1 is compare to their team mate. We know Carlos [Sainz Jnr] is an extremely quick, experienced race car driver. Your first measure is ultimately against your team mate so we expect them to race each other hard, race each other cleanly and for sure they need to get the measure of each other from time to time. That will be the first test and then we want to make sure we see them develop.

We recognise he’s going to make some rookie mistakes, we recognise he’s going to be at race tracks he’s never been to before and we’re in a rebuilding process. It’s one thing to jump into a team that’s rebuilding versus maybe jumping into a championship calibre car so we know he’s got a difficult task ahead and we’re going to be patient, work with him, as I think we did with Stoffel. Stoffel raced two years with us so I think McLaren has a pretty good history of sticking with their drivers. Obviously some have done one-year terms but that’s not our expectations on an outcome with Lando.

Quotes: Dieter Rencken

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Social media

Notable posts from Twitter, Instagram and more:

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Comment of the day

Pat is unsure about McLaren’s leadership overhaul:

This seems like a great acquisition on the face of it, but much like when Jost Capito and Eric Boullier were both in place as COO and Sporting Director (I think) respectively, the whole thing seems a bit top heavy again….

Zak Brown – CEO
Gil De Ferran – Sporting Director
Andreas Seidl – Managing Director (F1)
Bob Fernley – Managing Director (IndyCar)
James Key – Technical Director
Peter Prodromou – Chief Engineer
Paul James – Team Manager
Simon Roberts – Operation Director

The article does a good job of explaining who sits where, but surely this is two many cooks? here’s bound to be stepping on toes somewhere here.

Who will hand out the Freddos?
Pat Ruadh (@Fullcoursecaution)

Happy birthday!

No RaceFans birthdays today

If you want a birthday shout-out tell us when yours is via the contact form or adding to the list here.

On this day in F1

  • On this day in 1994 Jordan launched its 194 chassis. Rubens Barrichello was first to drive it – his team mate had not been announced yet.

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

33 comments on “McLaren accept Norris may make “rookie mistakes” in debut F1 season”

  1. There’s a typo in the Headline! I’m pretty sure it’s supposed to say “Norris accepts McLaren may make rookie mistakes”

    1. And I hope Zak was misquoted as well.
      Probably should be: “Our first measure is ultimately against other same engined teams. That will be the first test.

      Also great point in the CotD. I’m really disappointed with management (especially Zak Brown) at McLaren.
      Even teams with less issues have bitten the bullet and replaced the person at the top. Please McLaren, wake up and give us what you’re capable of; I’m sure there’s still loads of talent in the team.

    2. Well but they are in a transition period…since 2008, but still

      1. It’s McLaren’s lost decade. At least they are getting the excuses in early: Blame the new guy.
        They could name the new car the MP16-20, after the grid positions they’ll be targeting

        1. pretty much the third lost decade in a row

        2. Maybe this year will be their year…wait…I’m mixing teams again, must be the colour scheme

        3. Actually, how weird is it to think that Mercedes used to synonymous with unreliability?

          Well, at least they still excell at demotivating the finns

      2. I’d say more from 2013. They were still competitive and winning races between 08 and 12.

    3. Burn baby burn! Username checks out :P

  2. Stoffel raced two years with us so I think McLaren has a pretty good history of sticking with their drivers.

    Seriously? The McLaren of this decade? Since Hamilton left, it’s been a bit of a merry-go-round.

    @mrboerns – LOL, indeed.

    1. @phylyp exactly. Lewis apart, their record with young drivers over the last decade has been rubbish.

      Heikki Kovalainen probably wasn’t good enough, but you got the sense that he never really got a fair whack. They could have destroyed Sergio Perez’s career, but luckily he has rebounded to become a solid driver. There is very little that can be said about how things played out with Stoff.

      1. @jaymenon10 Kovalainen never got a fair chance, sometimes his car was two upgrades behind Hamilton’s as they pushed for the title and then the following year trying to correct a shocking car.

  3. “The evidence is actually that in a wet race, where you’ve got less grip, you get much better racing.” Pat Symonds. I love it that this guy makes money doing this.

    1. Might as well race on dirt or bring out the sprinklers. Makes me wonder what he thinks good racing is…

      1. Seems like he’d be a rally fan.

    2. In fairness, the statement was not necessarily true when Pat started in F1, in the early 1980s – improved technology on wet tyres since that era makes consistent racing in wet weather realistic, if chancy… …and “realistic, if chancy” is the best sort of racing. Before that, it was throwing dice whether a wet race would produce an epic, or merely epic amounts of crashing.

  4. An overtaking simulator is so cringe-worthy… Lots of high speeds straights and lots of hairpins.

    It’s not the way to go about things. If anything tracks should be designed to be the most challenging in terms of top speeds and G-force and mechanical stress. Put the cars on the limit. Safety is ever increasing, so take advantage of that by making the most spectacular tracks.

    Overtaking will happen, good racing will happen by closing the gap in overall lap time. As long as the human element remains and they can race closely without car performance degrading. Not this design by numbers “overtakes per lap” metric focused rubbish.

    1. Do a loop! Carrera has been doing it for decades

    2. @skipgamer With neuronal networks and AI I’m pretty sure they can have a very decent simulation software with all the data they have.

      Nowadays computer science has really stepped up and as a developer I’m confident that with a full access to their data an interesting software could be developed.

      How to use it however is another thing but you could have various scenarios, from validation to creation or optimization.

  5. The 1994 Jordon was a beautiful car. One of my favorites.

    1. funny, i think it is One of the worst. that Paintjob is just atrocious

  6. Hopefully, the car would also be more competitive than it was last season.

    An overtaking simulator. That’s interesting although the reality can still be quite a bit different on that front than what the sim shows.

    ”Who will hand out the Freddos?” – LOL.

    I wish I had a garage like that.

  7. “We have history of sticking with our drivers”.
    2 years is not “sticking with our drivers. Didn’t Vandoorne have problems with his chassis and not get the upgrades Alonso got? Even if they think 2 years for Stoffel was fine I reckon Magnussen, Magnussen, Kovalainen, Perez, Blundell, Brundle and others would disagree.

    1. maybe montoya? Was it ever cleared up who actually rage-quit whom?

  8. woah! too easy. First rookie error Lando, joining Mclaren

  9. The problem with designing circuits based on simulations or based on the need for overtaking is that were going to end up (Well continue I guess) with circuits all looking/feeling the same due to them incorporating the same characteristics that it’s felt make for the best racing.

    Since the whole ‘need more overtaking’ craze started what 15-20 years ago the only thing that’s come of it are a bunch of circuits which are fairly dull & very similar as well as a bunch of existing circuits & corners been ruined.
    Corners like the Bus Stop at Spa, Turn 10 at Barcelona, 1st few corners at Nurburging, Varianta-Alta at Imola among others may now be better overtaking places but none of them are as good or as challenging as they were before they were changed.

    Circuits should be designed to be challenging for car & driver like the classic circuits which drivers love driving & fans love watching were. If they end up producing some good racing great but that should not be the primary factor when designing them.

    1. @stefmeister i agree completely but it will never change because it only took a single race with little overtaking (Aus 17) after years of ‘Hurr Durr DRS highway passes’ to get people moaning about the terrible processions of the new regs. and that is on here, not with the infamous ‘Casual fans’.
      And after it proved more about the track than the cars everybody learnt their lesson until a Year later and then history repeated itself and now we get even bigger front wings and kneejerk regchanges as a Thank you

  10. These superficial and infantile comments from Zak (and Co. ?) are just tweets – why not leave them where they belong…? ;-)

    1. The next thing to do is to build a wall to keep the competition out.. oh.. wait..

  11. It’s usually the time of the year when Mclaren talks about how they’ve built the greatest chassis, and how they’ve got the best drivers in the world in maximising their results. Now… it’s a transitional year with a rookie who will probably make mistakes.

    I thought 2017 was a major transitional year, with Ron out / Zak in , Button out / Stoff in and an awesome Honda power unit for the new regulation changes. The transitional year status was then moved to 2018 with Honda out / Renault in, Boullier out / De Ferran in. Apparently now it’s moved to 2019 with Alonso out / Sainz in, Stoff out / Lando in and James Key who might or might not arrive this year. I’m actually wondering how many more transitional years can Mclaren manage??

    I’m scared for Mclaren…

Comments are closed.