Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes, Mugello, 2020

Hamilton says simulator didn’t help after struggling to learn Mugello

2020 Tuscan Grand Prix Ferrari 1000

Posted on

| Written by and

Lewis Hamilton said his pre-race simulator session didn’t help him learn the Mugello circuit, and his team mate Valtteri Bottas was much quicker at the start of the weekend.

The six-times champion admits he prefers not to use the simulator, but said he found it harder than usual to get to grips with the 15-turn Tuscan circuit when he drove it for the first time in real life yesterday.

“Normally I tend to think, [and] in my past I always felt, that one of my strengths is learning a circuit quite quickly,” he said. “For this one we went on the simulator which I never do and I don’t feel like I benefitted particularly.”

Hamilton was slower than Bottas throughout the three practice sessions prior to qualifying. But Hamilton beat him to pole position by 59 thousandths of a second, aided by a late yellow flag caused by Esteban Ocon.

“Getting here was a lot of work,” he said. “The pressure was incredibly high.

“Going out there, doing laps, I was struggling to get to the limit, find the limit in certain sectors. Valtteri was miles ahead really in some of those areas.

“So of course the pressure was higher than ever because if I hadn’t done the work then I wouldn’t have got the result that we got at the end.”

Hamilton described how he turned around his performance from Friday to Saturday.

“There’s an incredible amount of detail that you have to go into,” he said. “Last night [I was] dissecting every single corner basically, and sector, really trying to fine-tune that set-up.

“As a racing driver there’s a real fine line between knowing whether you’ve got understeer or oversteer, whether you’re on the limit or not in certain places. You can be on the limit through one corner but not through the rest of the corners, for example. It could be the first one and then not the second one but the third one you are.

“So really understanding whether you’ve got the balance right within yourself and then knowing what to request for when you do move towards the limit, what you need, you have to pre-empt what the car’s going to do. There’s a real science to it.

“That’s why I have so much respect for all these drivers because it’s not only the ability to drive but to understand those things and to be engineers, at the end of the day, we have to work with these geniuses that balance numbers like nobody else. But we need to be able to do that on the track.”

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

2020 Tuscan Grand Prix Ferrari 1000

    Browse all 2020 Tuscan Grand Prix Ferrari 1000 articles

    3 comments on “Hamilton says simulator didn’t help after struggling to learn Mugello”

    1. This track is a unique test of the driver. Most practices sessions has the drivers are fine tuning breaking points, or understanding the relationship between the latest tires, the machinery and the circuit.

      This weekends sees all the drivers on a totally unfamiliar track, learning it for the first time. The use of the simulation for a familiar track, is exposed when its applied to this totally unfamiliar track. It could be the simulation, eg the data model for this track, but its more likely the technology which is still not close enough to the reality.

      1. I hope their understanding of why the simulator ‘didn’t work’ leads to improvements.

        This could say a lot for how a driver’s prior experience ( of the circuit) helps bridge the short falls of the simulation.

        1. I think it’s one of those driver preference things, Lewis and Kimi don’t use the simulator or do track walks whereas other drivers on the grid do as much of that as they can. Difficult to criticise either way as they’ve all had success with their methods to get there.
          I’d imagine the simulator being useful for looking at lines, perhaps getting advanced warning of any severe bumps etc but modelling how the tyres feel at different points of their lifecycle and replicating with accuracy how the car feels under braking on different surfaces are probably still quite difficult things to get right.

    Comments are closed.