Discussions between the FIA Formula 1 race director and teams should be broadcast on television, Red Bull team principal Christian Horner has said, following criticism over the role they played in the outcome of last year’s world championship.
F1 began broadcasting communications involving the race director for the first time last year. It captured the dramatic conclusion to the season in Abu Dhabi, where both Red Bull and Mercedes lobbied former race director Michael Masi over his handling of a Safety Car period at the end of the race.Horner believes F1 team principals should be prevented from speaking to the race director in the same way in future, but says some communication between the parties needs to continue.
“I think the team manager certainly should retain that ability to speak to race control,” he told Sky on Friday. “Getting the team principals off is, I think, probably a good thing because it does keep the dialogue just between, the team managers and the organisers.”
He also wants the broadcasting of the messages to continue. “I think it’s important that still broadcast because I think it’s important to know and understand what is being transmitted between the pit wall and race control,” he said.
The FIA published its report on the Abu Dhabi controversy yesterday. It stated “the respective communications to the race director by the Red Bull Racing and Mercedes team principals during the final laps of the 2021 Abu Dhabi GP had a negative impact on the smooth running of the final laps because they were distracting when the race director needed to focus on making difficult and time-pressured decisions.”
FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem said teams will still be allowed to communicate with race direction in the event of any emergencies.
“I think it was used as entertainment for the fans, but actually it has its downside,” he said. “And then the race director and the whole race control was just bombarded by unnecessary [messages] and everybody was complaining.
“That was putting, I don’t think, pressure, but I think stress on the race director there. So now none of this. If there is any emergency need for radio control, then they press a button, then it will go through.”
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
2022 Bahrain Grand Prix
- F1 keeps same three DRS zones for first race weekend with new cars
- Will F1’s new era deliver? What’s the final verdict on Abu Dhabi? Five Bahrain GP talking points
- Imola replaces China as F1 confirms 23-race calendar for 2022 season
OlPeculier
20th March 2022, 13:17
What might work is if there was an intermediary between the pit walls and the race director. If it was deemed important, the message would be passed upstream, if not simply ignored.
The Dolphins
20th March 2022, 13:36
Or a technical foul where the Race Director can report to the stewards when a team radios him about something which is not an emergency. The penalty would need to be a combination of constructors points and a financial penalty.
Erzen (@xenn1)
20th March 2022, 14:47
The teams were always able to discuss things with the race director and they should maintain an ability to do so, it went sideways once they started broadcasting them because the teams saw an opportunity to use the broadcast element to sway the director and/or the public opinion their way. It’s my biggest gripe with how Abu Dhabi went.
And then again, didn’t Horner himself say last month that broadcasting team-race director radios was probably the wrong move and that it shouldn’t happen anymore going forward? Is Horner just saying whatever suits his and his team’s daily narrative or am i misremembering stuff?
JustSomeone
20th March 2022, 13:31
“Discussions between the FIA Formula 1 race director and teams should be broadcast”
Should be forbidden – way too much whining.
Remarks to race direction should be in the form of simple written templates.
Sensord4notbeingafanboi (@peartree)
20th March 2022, 23:55
Completely disagree. For the sake of transparency these talks should be public. When Masi pushed for this I facepalmed because I thought it was going to make Masi look incompetent. We know what teams say we just don’t know what race direction does after these talks.
AlonsoStig (@stigf1l)
20th March 2022, 13:42
Agree (the important ones), what’s the point on hiding them?
Fer no.65 (@fer-no65)
20th March 2022, 13:51
Yeah, if there’s gonna be back and forth communication, it should be broadcasted. Why would you hide it? Let everyone know what’s being said…
Hiding it would only make it less transparent.
Tristan (@skipgamer)
20th March 2022, 14:18
I don’t think it’s right for there to be free flowing general conversation broadcast from the teams during the race. If they want an investigation sure, they should ask for it, but the lobbying and agenda setting has to stop. There should be no opportunity to complain about a decision or influence decisions.
Ofcourse Horner wants it to be broadcast, the pressure they put the race director on publicly won them the championship. Red Bull were 100% setting the agenda by telling Masi the race shouldn’t end under yellow.
anon
20th March 2022, 14:51
@fer-no65 you could ask Wheatley about that, as he has stated that he wants Liberty Media to stop broadcasting messages so he could lobby the race director in private.
David BR (@david-br)
20th March 2022, 14:20
‘Discussions.’ OK. As long as its not the dubious offering and bartering we heard between Masi and Red Bull.
erikje
20th March 2022, 18:14
All discussions should be public.
Not trying to I fluence the RD outside the public eye.
(as by sending personal emails)
x303 (@x303)
20th March 2022, 17:37
I’m with Horner on this one: the lobbying should be made public.
sumedh
20th March 2022, 21:18
This has predictably gone the same way as the televised drivers’ briefings with Charlie Whiting done in 2017 / 2018.
I think not broadcasting makes sense. The intent, honesty, transparency of the participants – team personnel, drivers – is inevitably compromised knowing that the exchange is getting televised. Instead of seeking genuine clarifications, the particiapnts are catering to their fans and trying to sway the public opinion.
May be they should make it public after the race, that way we have transparency but not direct pressure on race director.