Failed part which caused Verstappen’s latest retirement ‘had done over 10,000km’

2022 Emilia-Romagna Grand Prix

Posted on

| Written by and

Red Bull team principal Christian Horner says they have corrected the failure which caused Max Verstappen’s retirement from the Australian Grand Prix.

The world champion posted his second retirement from the first three races of the season while running second in Melbourne. Horner said a failure occured in a part which had already been well-tested.

“We’ve been working with our colleagues at HRC [Honda Racing Corporation] in Japan, they found the issues that resolved it and I believe we have a fix for this weekend,” Horner told Sky. “It was just very unfortunate, a part that’s done tens of thousands of kilometres without an issue but unfortunately it appeared at exactly the wrong time in Australia.”

Verstappen’s retirement was the third for the team in six starts so far this year. Sergio Perez, who dropped out of the Bahrain Grand Prix on the final lap, is encouraged by how swiftly the team has identified the causes of the failures.

“What gives us hope is that all the issues for the reliability problems we’ve had, we understood them and we were able to fix them,” he said. “So for now on hopefully there are no more surprises.

“Something unexpected can happen still, but we feel like we’ve come on top of them. That will be critical for us on our side as a team to make sure we are able to collect the points we are able to get weekend by weekend because so far it’s been extremely painful.”

Perez said the team has also been working on why it suffered higher tyre degradation than rivals Ferrari at the last race.

“Certainly in Melbourne they were probably two steps ahead, especially on race day they were very strong,” he said. “I think our deg was quite high come race day.

“We have some understanding on what went wrong. Hopefully, we are able to fix it and be a lot closer on Sunday and in qualifying. We’ll see what we are able to do this weekend.”

Despite Ferrari’s strong championship lead, Perez believes the competition is getting closer between the front-running teams.

“I think everyone is quite close in the pecking order. We saw last weekend anyone can do a really, really good lap time in qualifying and in the race. So I think as the season is progressing the teams are getting closer.”

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

2022 F1 season

[catlist id=34380 numberposts=5 excludeposts=this]Browse all 2022 F1 season articles

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...
Claire Cottingham
Claire has worked in motorsport for much of her career, covering a broad mix of championships including Formula One, Formula E, the BTCC, British...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

9 comments on “Failed part which caused Verstappen’s latest retirement ‘had done over 10,000km’”

  1. Failed part which caused Verstappen’s latest retirement ‘had done over 10,000km’

    Maybe we should start a go fund me to help Redbull so they can afford to buy new parts more often?

    1. Ahah, indeed, that is around 33 race distances.

    2. I mean if this was a component from last year’s engine that still had useful life then why not reuse it??
      Simple things like wire looms, hoses, brackets, screws are pretty robust for many thousands of miles, it’s just a matter of using them within their right tolerances.

    3. I am probably wrong, but I took the comment to mean the part design, not one single part, had gone that distance without a failure/problem.

      1. That’s the way I read it (not the headline, but the quote).

  2. I think what he meant was the part that failed in Vertstappen’s car, that specification was tested to last more than tens of thousands km – Not the actual failed part used in Vertstappen’s car was used for over 10,000 km?

    This is a very confusing statement to interpret.

    1. It has to be the part specification. Cars are basically new for 2022 and I’d be surprised if they had reused any actual parts from 2021.

  3. At least they know the lifetime of that part now :)

Comments are closed.